Conclusions and recommendations

If there are no recommendations to be manufactured due to the project, just call this section Conclusions.

The Conclusions section sums up the important thing points of your discussion, the essential attributes of your design, or perhaps the significant outcomes of one's investigation. As its function is to round the story off of any project, it must:

• be written to relate straight to the aims of the project as stated within the Introduction
• indicate the extent to which the aims have already been achieved
• summarise the key findings, outcomes or information in your report
• acknowledge limitations and then make recommendations for future work (where applicable)
• highlight the value or usefulness of your work.

The conclusions should connect with the aims associated with work:

The goal of this project is always to design a mobile phone tower for a suburban location..

The mobile phone tower presented here could be erected safely in a street that is suburban.

It entails a complete area of a maximum of 2m 2 l, and has now the safety that is following.

This investigation will review the quantity of passengers making use of the Monash University Clayton-Caulfield inter-campus bus so that you can recommend adjustments to the service if needed.

Analysis for the survey data obtained in this project implies that usage of the Clayton-Caulfield inter-campus bus has increased by 24% in the past 5 years. It is strongly suggested that frequency be increased during peak usage.

The Conclusions section below is from a known level 2 Civil Engineering Alternative Designs report presenting two designs for a an overpass bridge. Click the buttons that are coloured begin to see the comments.

Conclusions

All the two bridge designs Lecturer's comment:
An elegant beginning for a Conclusions follows on neatly from the preceding discussion. In this full case, moreover it indicates that the aims associated with project have already been met. presented in this report fulfil the criteria specified in the project brief. Both designs Lecturer's comment:
The main findings or outcomes - in this case the main element popular features of the designs - are then recapped. Incorporate piers that are round piled foundations, which are used as the soil conditions are unknown and possibly unstable. Design 1, a straightforward composite I-girder bridge, has the benefit of being made of steel and thus has longer spans and fewer piers.

Design 2, a super-T beam br >Design 2 Lecturer's comment:
The importance of the results - in this situation the final recommendation - is actually stated. is therefore recommended. It includes Lecturer's comment:
To finish off, the achievement associated with project is reinforced. An overpass that is affordable superior durability, and fully meets the requirements of this design brief.

Always address limitations and suggest how they may be overcome in future work. The below that is excerpt from the Conclusions of a report on a project investigating the effect of pulsation on heat transfer in horizontal pipe flow.

Experimental results Lecturer's comment:
Key conclusions drawn through the project. revealed that pulsed flow without flow reversal had no significant effect compared with steady flow. Preliminary experiments with reversed flow, however, clearly indicated increased heat transfer. This might be likely due Lecturer's comment:
Provide a explanation that is possible notable results, especially unexpected ones. to the large disturbances when you look at the hydrodynamic boundary layer once the flow changes direction. Further research Lecturer's comment:
Recommend further research to handle any work that is extra think could be useful. is preferred to determine the most enhancement that is achievable.

It ought to be noted that Lecturer's comment:
Acknowledge limitations or errors and suggest explanations and/or solutions. the experimental results usually do not agree with the theoretical equations. This might be due to the deposits which developed inside the pipe, or even to thermocouple temperature that is inconsistent. Therefore, regular inspection of the test rig is preferred.

For a rather report that is long it really is acceptable to present the conclusions and recommendations in point form:

The prototype robot courier presented here has been confirmed to be capable of delivering documents autonomously in an working office environment. It has demonstrated listed here the different parts of mobile robotics:

1. Localisation: The Kalman http://payforpapers.net localisation that is filter-based achieved sub-centimeter accuracy under normal operating conditions.
2. Environment modelling: The occupancy map was updated dynamically to incorporate obstacles not included in the map that is original.
3. Path planning: A distance transform-based path planner using obstacle transforms produced a globally optimal local entrapment-free road to the target.